How can we transcend language (symbols, fine art, music any form of human communicaiton) to be able to know the real Truth of what is?Can we get access to the "thing itself" as Plato would like?
Are we more like the sophists or Plato in our thinking, Why?
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Monday, September 21, 2009
General Posting Expectations
• Please be sure to post at least one blog comment for each question posted by a peer or me.
• Feel free to start a post with your own question pertaining to academics only. Your questions will become your peers' homework and responsibility.
• You should respond to any post, from this time forward, within three days. Posts after that time are considered late. Easy for me to check the time as they are date stamped.
• All posts, WHEN BASED ON A READING OR AS A WAY TO ADD SUPPORT TO YOUR OPINION, should have a snippet, swath, section, smidgen, sliver, sample, spot of quotation from the text we are reading to support your opinion. Remember my mantra: Everyone can have an opinion, but not everyone can support one.
• If you ever have any questions about instructions or posts, email me directly, and I will get back to you for clarification.
• Feel free to start a post with your own question pertaining to academics only. Your questions will become your peers' homework and responsibility.
• You should respond to any post, from this time forward, within three days. Posts after that time are considered late. Easy for me to check the time as they are date stamped.
• All posts, WHEN BASED ON A READING OR AS A WAY TO ADD SUPPORT TO YOUR OPINION, should have a snippet, swath, section, smidgen, sliver, sample, spot of quotation from the text we are reading to support your opinion. Remember my mantra: Everyone can have an opinion, but not everyone can support one.
• If you ever have any questions about instructions or posts, email me directly, and I will get back to you for clarification.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Philosophers to Read this Semester
Add to this list:
Plato
Socrates
Epicurus
Gandhi
Lewis
Homer
Nietzsche
Rousseau
Locke
Kant
Mill
Kirkegaard
Da Vinci
Appiah
Descartes
Montaigne
Sartre
Derrida
Foucault
Arendt
Gilligan
Plato
Socrates
Epicurus
Gandhi
Lewis
Homer
Nietzsche
Rousseau
Locke
Kant
Mill
Kirkegaard
Da Vinci
Appiah
Descartes
Montaigne
Sartre
Derrida
Foucault
Arendt
Gilligan
Perspective, Opinions vs. Foundations, Truths
The conversation in class has led to the conclusion that all that is is opinion or perspective about truth (and universal or absolute Truth seems lost). With examples like moral truth, family values, and education, we have stated that opinion not an objective, absolute reason or truth guides our decisions about why we do what we do, i.e. not kill each other, go to school, teach and learn the same way for so many years etc.
The question is -- Why do we (people) all seem to go along with what we are told (go to school, work a regular 9 to 5 job, not be cannibals) if the power choose is based in our own opinions? Are we all simply victims of cultural and paternal influence and lemmings to those dictates and therefore conform or is there another reason for the continuity we see in people's actions?
The question is -- Why do we (people) all seem to go along with what we are told (go to school, work a regular 9 to 5 job, not be cannibals) if the power choose is based in our own opinions? Are we all simply victims of cultural and paternal influence and lemmings to those dictates and therefore conform or is there another reason for the continuity we see in people's actions?
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Links to Data and Information to Make Us THINK
The goal of the course is simplistic, yet simplicity is a willful and difficult act of metacogniton that requires, paradoxically complex thought about what thinking is, what the thinking process looks like, and how to control it; especially if you are just trying to be simple, straight forward, what you are.
Although we may not move only in chronological order, nor beg that question that one philosophical movement is necessarily a direct reaction and evolution of the previous movement in history, it is important that we look at the way that historical contexts effect philosophical movements and how seemingly disparate movements, separated by time, might participate in similar conversations about what thinking is.
Below are some links to Western Philosophical Time lines for Figures and Movements we will cover during the semester:
Kent State Professor of Computer Science Link
Philosophical Society .COM
Pre Socratics
Although we may not move only in chronological order, nor beg that question that one philosophical movement is necessarily a direct reaction and evolution of the previous movement in history, it is important that we look at the way that historical contexts effect philosophical movements and how seemingly disparate movements, separated by time, might participate in similar conversations about what thinking is.
Below are some links to Western Philosophical Time lines for Figures and Movements we will cover during the semester:
Kent State Professor of Computer Science Link
Philosophical Society .COM
Pre Socratics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)